All Categories
💪 Fitness Tools
⚖️ BMI Calculator 🔥 Calorie Calculator 📊 Calorie Deficit Calculator 🥩 Macro Calculator 💪 Protein Calculator 🏋️ One Rep Max Calculator 📐 Body Fat Calculator ❤️ Heart Rate Calculator 🏃 Running Pace Calculator 🎯 Ideal Weight Calculator 📋 Workout Volume Calculator

⚖️ Ideal Weight Calculator — Healthy Weight Range for Your Height

Find your ideal body weight using four clinical formulas — Robinson, Devine, Miller, and Hamwi — with frame size adjustment.

cm
kg

Your ideal weight estimates:

Ideal Weight Facts

4 formulas
Robinson, Devine, Miller & Hamwi — each with different origins
±10%
Frame size adjusts ideal weight up or down by ~10%
BMI 18.5–24.9
Corresponds to the healthy weight range for most adults
1964
Year the Hamwi formula was first published in clinical dietetics
≠ goal weight
IBW is a reference point, not a mandatory target
How It Works

How Ideal Weight Formulas Were Developed

Ideal weight range chart comparing Devine, Robinson, Miller, and Hamwi formulas

Ideal body weight formulas were originally developed not for fitness goals but for clinical use — calculating drug dosages, ventilator settings, and nutritional support in hospitalised patients. The Hamwi formula (1964) appeared first, followed by Devine (1974), then Robinson and Miller both published refinements in 1983.

Each formula uses a linear equation based on height: a base weight for 5 feet (152.4cm) with an increment per inch of height above that. They differ slightly in their base values and per-inch increments, which is why they produce different results for the same person.

None of the formulas account for muscle mass, body composition, or ethnicity — factors that meaningfully affect what a healthy weight looks like for a specific individual.

The four formulas (for 170cm / 5'7" height)

♂ Male: 50 + 2.3 × (inches above 60)
♀ Female: 45.5 + 2.3 × (inches above 60)
Originally for drug dosage calculations in hospitals
♂ Male: 52 + 1.9 × (inches above 60)
♀ Female: 49 + 1.7 × (inches above 60)
Published as a refinement of Devine with updated population data
♂ Male: 56.2 + 1.41 × (inches above 60)
♀ Female: 53.1 + 1.36 × (inches above 60)
Another 1983 refinement; gives slightly higher values for tall people
♂ Male: 48 + 2.7 × (inches above 60)
♀ Female: 45.5 + 2.2 × (inches above 60)
Oldest formula; still widely used in clinical dietetics

Ideal Weight by Height — Quick Reference

Average of Robinson, Devine, Miller & Hamwi formulas. Medium frame. Values in kg.

HeightMale (avg)Female (avg)BMI 18.5–24.9 range
155cm (5'1")55–57 kg51–53 kg44–60 kg
160cm (5'3")59–61 kg55–57 kg47–64 kg
165cm (5'5")63–66 kg58–61 kg50–68 kg
170cm (5'7")67–70 kg62–65 kg53–72 kg
175cm (5'9")71–74 kg66–69 kg57–76 kg
180cm (5'11")75–79 kg70–73 kg60–81 kg
185cm (6'1")80–83 kg74–78 kg63–85 kg

Frequently Asked Questions

Ideal weight depends on height, sex, and frame size. For a 170cm woman with a medium frame, the Robinson formula gives approximately 60kg (132 lbs). For a man of the same height, it's 65kg (143 lbs). All formulas produce a range of roughly ±10%, so the most useful output is a weight range rather than a single number. The BMI-based healthy weight range (18.5–24.9) offers another reference point.

No single formula is definitively the most accurate — each was developed for a different clinical context. The Devine formula (1974) was originally created for drug dosage calculations. Robinson (1983) and Miller (1983) were published as refinements. Hamwi (1964) is still used in clinical dietetics. Most researchers recommend averaging all four for a realistic target and treating the result as the centre of a healthy range, not an exact target.

Not exactly. Ideal body weight (IBW) formulas produce a single number from a linear height equation. Healthy weight refers to a range corresponding to BMI 18.5–24.9. The two often overlap but can differ, especially for tall or short people where the linear IBW formulas become less accurate. For most people between 152–188cm (5'0\"–6'2\"), both approaches give similar results.

The simplest method: wrap your thumb and middle finger around your wrist just below the wrist bone. If your fingers overlap, you have a small frame. If they just touch, medium frame. If they don't reach, large frame. Frame size affects ideal weight by roughly ±10% — a large-frame person's IBW is about 10% higher than the medium-frame formula default.

Yes — IBW formulas don't account for high muscle mass. A 180cm male bodybuilder at 95kg with 12% body fat is clinically healthy but would appear "overweight" by both IBW formulas and BMI. For muscular individuals, body fat percentage is a much more meaningful metric than either BMI or IBW. Use the body fat calculator alongside this tool for a complete picture.

{{ $a }}

Ideal Weight for Women by Height — Which Formula Is Best?

For women, the Robinson formula is generally considered the best-calibrated of the four. It was specifically developed as a refinement of Devine with updated population samples. The Devine formula (which was derived from data on men and simply adjusted for women) tends to produce slightly lower values. For practical purposes, average the four formulas and add ±10% for your frame size — the resulting range gives a realistic target without over-specifying a single number.

Ideal Body Weight Calculator for Men — Military and Clinical Standards

The US military uses a weight-for-height table with maximum weight limits and a body fat standard as the fallback. A man who exceeds the maximum weight table but passes the body fat tape test is still eligible — this recognises that muscular individuals legitimately exceed IBW predictions. The Army's standards roughly correspond to BMI 27.5 for men, which is above the standard "overweight" threshold but reflects the reality of physically fit, muscular soldiers.

How Frame Size Affects Your Ideal Weight

Frame size is rarely discussed but meaningfully changes your target range. Bone density and skeletal dimensions contribute significantly to total body weight — a large-framed person with healthy body composition simply weighs more than a small-framed person at the same height and fitness level. The ±10% adjustment for frame size translates to roughly 6–8kg for most adults. If you're naturally broad-shouldered with dense bones, a weight at the upper end of your IBW range is perfectly appropriate.

Ideal Weight: What the Formulas Don't Tell You

The four IBW formulas were all developed before the widespread use of DEXA scans and body composition analysis. They assume a linear relationship between height and ideal weight that holds reasonably well for the average population but breaks down for athletes, people with unusual proportions, or those of non-European ancestry (for whom BMI cutoffs themselves are debated).

The Practical Limitation

These formulas produce a single point estimate that gives a false sense of precision. A 175cm man is told his IBW is 72kg — but a muscular 80kg man with 12% body fat and a lean 65kg man with 22% body fat are on opposite ends of the health spectrum despite both sitting near the IBW range. Use IBW as one data point alongside body fat percentage, waist circumference, and fitness markers.

Note: Ideal weight is a reference tool, not a medical target. Speak with a healthcare provider or registered dietitian if you have specific health conditions or concerns about your weight. Body composition, metabolic health, and fitness level matter far more than any single number.